Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Raphaelle Lacasse vs Tara Malik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lacasse vs Malik analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphaelle Lacasse vs Tara Malik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lacasse 1 - 0 Malik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lacasse has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Malik has won 37.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lacasse, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Malik has won 40%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lacasse has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Malik has saved 59.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lacasse has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Malik winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lacasse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Malik has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Lacasse has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Malik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lacasse winning 1 times and Malik being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lacasse winning 2 and Malik winning 1. The last match between Lacasse and Malik was at the W15 Monastir, 15-06-2021, First, Hard with Raphaelle Lacasse getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lacasse and Malik have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lacasse winning 1 times and Malik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lacasse winning 0, and Malik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lacasse has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Malik has played against players with an average rank of 127.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lacasse has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Malik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lacasse has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Malik has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
899
Rank
729
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
50% (42-42)
Career Total W/L
46% (36-43)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Raphaelle Lacasse vs Tara Malik For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lacasse VS Malik
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Raphaelle Lacasse | Tara Malik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Raphaelle Lacasse | Tara Malik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 62% (23/14) | 41% (33/47) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 127.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (83/123) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (40/83) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (15/40) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (32/96) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Raphaelle Lacasse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Christina Mchale
Player
Raphaelle Lacasse
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Raphaelle Lacasse
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
25 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphaelle Lacasse
Player
Solymar Colling
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphaelle Lacasse
Player
Emira Stafford
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
90%
(
28 of
31)
50
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mao Mushika
Player
Raphaelle Lacasse
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphaelle Lacasse
Player
Marne Dercksen
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenna Defalco
Player
Raphaelle Lacasse
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Tara Malik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Tara Malik
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Najah Dawson
Player
Tara Malik
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Tara Malik
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Tara Malik
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tara Malik
Player
Emma Mazzoni
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tara Malik
Player
Kacie Harvey
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lacasse Vs Malik Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lacasse are available here and Malik photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
